Life on
Earth began more than 3 billion years ago, evolving from the most basic of
microbes into a dazzling array of complexity over time. But how did the first
organisms on the only known home to life in the universe develop from the
primordial soup?
Here are
science's theories on the origins of life on Earth.
1. Electric Spark
Electric
sparks can generate amino acids and sugars from an atmosphere loaded with
water, methane, ammonia and hydrogen, as was shown in the famous Miller-Urey
experiment reported in 1953, suggesting that lightning might have helped create
the key building blocks of life on Earth in its early days. Over millions of
years, larger and more complex molecules could form. Although research since
then has revealed the early atmosphere of Earth was actually hydrogen-poor,
scientists have suggested that volcanic clouds in the early atmosphere might
have held methane, ammonia and hydrogen and been filled with lightning as well.
2. Community Clay
The first
molecules of life might have met on clay, according to an idea elaborated by
organic chemist Alexander Graham Cairns-Smith at the University of Glasgow in
Scotland. These surfaces might not only have concentrated these organic
compounds together, but also helped organize them into patterns much like our
genes do now.
3. Deep-Sea Vents
The
deep-sea vent theory suggests that life may have begun at submarine
hydrothermal vents, spewing key hydrogen-rich molecules. Their rocky nooks
could then have concentrated these molecules together and provided mineral
catalysts for critical reactions. Even now, these vents, rich in chemical and
thermal energy, sustain vibrant ecosystems.
4. Chilly Start.
Ice might
have covered the oceans 3 billion years ago, as the sun was about a third less
luminous than it is now. This layer of ice, possibly hundreds of feet thick,
might have protected fragile organic compounds in the water below from
ultraviolet light and destruction from cosmic impacts. The cold might have also
helped these molecules to survive longer, allowing key reactions to happen.
5. RNA World.
Nowadays
DNA needs proteins in order to form, and proteins require DNA to form, so how
could these have formed without each other? The answer may be RNA, which can
store information like DNA, serve as an enzyme like proteins, and help create
both DNA and proteins. Later DNA and proteins succeeded this "RNA
world," because they are more efficient. RNA still exists and performs
several functions in organisms, including acting as an on-off switch for some
genes. The question still remains how RNA got here in the first place. And
while some scientists think the molecule could have spontaneously arisen on
Earth, others say that was very unlikely to have happened.
6. Simple
Beginnings
Instead of
developing from complex molecules such as RNA, life might have begun with
smaller molecules interacting with each other in cycles of reactions. These
might have been contained in simple capsules akin to cell membranes, and over
time more complex molecules that performed these reactions better than the
smaller ones could have evolved, scenarios dubbed "metabolism-first"
models, as opposed to the "gene-first" model of the "RNA
world" hypothesis.
7. Panspermia
Perhaps
life did not begin on Earth at all, but was brought here from elsewhere in
space, a notion known as panspermia. For instance, rocks regularly get blasted
off Mars by cosmic impacts, and a number of Martian meteorites have been found
on Earth that some researchers have controversially suggested brought microbes
over here, potentially making us all Martians originally. Other scientists have
even suggested that life might have hitchhiked on comets from other star
systems. However, even if this concept were true, the question of how life
began on Earth would then only change to how life began elsewhere in space.
FUENSANTA HERNÁNDEZ SALMERÓN
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario